Governance Checklist vs Governance Maturity Assessment: What's the Difference?
A checklist asks "do you have a policy?" A maturity assessment asks whether it's current, implemented, embedded in decision-making — and what evidence demonstrates that.
A governance checklist asks whether a policy exists. A governance maturity assessment asks whether it is current, applied consistently, owned, evidenced and embedded in decisions — and places the organisation on a scale from vulnerable to optimised.
This section explains governance maturity for NGOs and mission-driven organisations, how evidence-based assessment works, and what assessment findings reveal. It is the thinking behind the IGMA™ (Institutional Governance Maturity Assessment) method.
Curated by CA Sunil Kumar, FCA — Chartered Accountant and social-sector CFO with 30+ years in NGO finance, audit and governance.
The ideas behind evidence-based governance assessment, and how they connect.
A checklist asks "do you have a policy?" A maturity assessment asks whether it's current, implemented, embedded in decision-making — and what evidence demonstrates that.
Five observations from implementing an evidence-based Governance Maturity Assessment — on why governance frameworks define governance, but governance behaviour determines maturity.
Peer benchmark data (directional, not representative — based on 14 NGO assessments) showing strong correlations between Financial Stewardship and both Stakeholder Trust (0.92) and Operational Excellence (0.91) — and why a weakness in one pillar can weaken the others.
A look at the eight areas under Pillar 1 — board skills, independence, composition, diversity, evaluation — and why "we have the skills" is different from "we have assessed whether we have the skills, and can demonstrate it."
Free videos and audiobook chapters. They load only when you press play.